Marshall Supa Wah
Moderator: The Captain
- mjkk
- Posts: 2524
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:11 am
Marshall Supa Wah
Wondering if anyt here has had a go with one of these. I have the oppertunity to pick one up for a decent price. Has the germ 2G374's.
Thanks for your info!
~M
Thanks for your info!
~M
"Yes I remember a brave guy named Roger dancing around musicians and cleaning their shoes. Occasionally we gave him our broken pedals for repair to get peace for some hours."
- joegagan
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:06 am
- mjkk
- Posts: 2524
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:11 am
- Mr. Min T. Fresh
- Posts: 3440
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:59 am
- Location: Chi-Town Mang
- mjkk
- Posts: 2524
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:11 am
Really the Supa Wah is colorsound based. tons of low end then I assume?? I'll give Stu a email, unless he sees this and chimes in :)
"Yes I remember a brave guy named Roger dancing around musicians and cleaning their shoes. Occasionally we gave him our broken pedals for repair to get peace for some hours."
- Funky Druid
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:05 am
- Location: PL
- joegagan
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:06 am
there seems to be a lot of mystery around the supawah. some were germanium, possibly later silicons were used. reports of widely varying inductor values used. this would have caused a wide swing in freq. response from unit to unit.
i believe brad's unit above has a custom made inductor, which contributes to that deep low endy tone, which i really like. but there is another supawah vid on youtube ( vintage unit) that sounds thin and more like a normal wah.
effect archeologists note that the circuit is roughly based on early vox wahs, as many wahs of the time were. i think the differences come down to inductor Mh more than anything else, which in the case of the supawah makes getting a used one a crapshoot.
i believe brad's unit above has a custom made inductor, which contributes to that deep low endy tone, which i really like. but there is another supawah vid on youtube ( vintage unit) that sounds thin and more like a normal wah.
effect archeologists note that the circuit is roughly based on early vox wahs, as many wahs of the time were. i think the differences come down to inductor Mh more than anything else, which in the case of the supawah makes getting a used one a crapshoot.
"Scuze me while I rip the sky....."--DucRyder
- redeyeflight
- Posts: 6939
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:48 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Creepyfingers
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:59 pm
Re: Marshall Supa Wah
The Marshall Supawah is probably closer to a Crybaby circuit than a Colorsound but it has a way bigger inductor and the .22's caps are .1's. Its lower voiced compared to the Crybaby. Very vocal but can be on the dark side. That green one was a point to point build...
- Stu
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:35 pm
Re: Marshall Supa Wah
I've owned a few Supa Wahs, and repaired a number for others. From the data I've gathered, it appears that 4000 - 5000 were made between 1969 and 1973. They were based on the Vox/Crybaby circuit, with a few notable changes: germanium transistors ('69-'71), 0.1uF vs. 0.22uF caps, a 200k linear pot and a larger value inductor. Joe is correct that the later ones had silicon transistors. There is a wide spread on inductance values; I serviced one which had a 600mH inductor, but most are closer to 1H. With the lower sweep range, a linear pot, and a big clunky housing, I'd suggest they're more suited to adding some colour to rhythm work than Hendrix/Clapton style wig outs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests